Happy Army Day, Zaire!

I've been and will foreseeably remain, quite busy.

Some things are just too much fun, take for example:
"Petitioner suggests that one consideration weighing in favor of finding the power to abrogate here is that the act authorizes only prospective injunctive relief rather than retroactive monetary relief." Simple, right? Agreed, the suggestion according to the jurisprudence is irrelevant. So the question must then be larger, when or where is there Congressional authority to abrogate unilaterally a state's sovereign immunity?
--for a hint, read Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996).